Last week I wrote about the time-of-use pricing scheme that PG&E offers in San Francisco, and how solar power is worth 14% more compared to a standard flat-rate electricity plan. In reality, it's 36% or more.
John Farrell
Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
Last week I wrote about the time-of-use pricing scheme that PG&E offers in San Francisco, and how solar power is worth 14% more compared to a standard flat-rate electricity plan. In reality, it's 36% or more.
John Farrell
That seems correct. Solar is generated during peak demand time for the utility and off peak for the home owner. So The electricity that is produced should be purchased by the utility at peak rates. Then at night during off peak times, the home owner bus back electricity at a lower off peak rate. Utilities then don't have to plan construction of plants to meet peak demand, but to meet off peak demand.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |