New research could lead to more cost-effective materials for using waste heat for electricity and cooling – opening up innovation in a new class of waste heat conversion technologies.
by Zachary Rybarczyk
Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
New research could lead to more cost-effective materials for using waste heat for electricity and cooling – opening up innovation in a new class of waste heat conversion technologies.
by Zachary Rybarczyk
Past advances in the field have been stymied by the lack of ability to produce both electron (“n-type”), and proton-heavy (“p-type”), nanoparticles, both necessary for electricity conversion, and a problem that RPI researchers have overcome:
The technique, presented in a Nature Materials paper posted online last week, makes p-type materials that are as efficient as the best ones on the market, while the n-type materials are at least 25 percent more efficient. One of the biggest commercial thermoelectric device manufacturers is now interested in adopting the new materials and process.
The key breakthrough of the RPI work, according to Badding, is that the researchers are building the nanostructured materials from the bottom up using chemistry. This means they can fine-tune the properties of the building blocks and their assembly to improve the material’s properties. “The way they’re making the material is a big deal,” he says. “The hope is that in the future, this type of approach could lead to better [efficiency].”
This is a great advance. Most of the energy loss in any conversion is in the form of heat. The more ways we have of converting this waste heat into electricity the more efficient the conversion becomes. It is possible with this technology to take something like a SOFC, that is about 35% to 45% efficient, add gas turbine co generation to the exhaust at about 20% to 30% efficiency (based on the original fuel) and then add this thermoelectric system at about 3% or higher for this new material and wind up getting 58% to 78% efficiency based on the energy content of the original fuel.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |