Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Par4TheCourse's column >>

PAR4THECOURSE

Home Page
Death Penalty for Child Predators
Articles Posted: 14  Links Seeded: 30440
Member Since: 8/2009  Last Seen: 5/23/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Study links social security improvements to longer life span - When benefits are improved, older people benefit most

Seeded on Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:52 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: EurekAlert!
health, social-security, health-sciences, public-health-policy, population-health, income-support-policies, new-york-medical-college
Seeded by Par4TheCourse
Advertise | AdChoices

New findings from researchers at New York Medical College suggest that when Social Security benefits are improved, people over the age of 65 benefit most, and may even live longer.

According to a new study published in the Journal of Public Health Policy, Americans over the age of 65 experienced steep declines in the rate of mortality in the periods that followed the founding of and subsequent improvements to Social Security. The authors urge that as Congress and the President discuss changes to Social Security they consider the benefit of reduced mortality and improved health among older Americans.

--Donna E. Moriarty, M.P.H.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Par4TheCourse's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (4)
Par4TheCourse

News Vine CoH

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:53 PM EST
Par4TheCourse

"The political discourse around Social Security focuses exclusively on the system's long-range financial problems rather than on the benefits of improved health and reduced poverty," said Peter Arno, Ph.D., the study's lead author and professor and director of the doctoral program in the Department of Health Policy and Management of the School of Health Sciences and Practice at New York Medical College. "If Social Security is put on the chopping block, lawmakers will jeopardize the most important safety net for America's elderly."

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:53 PM EST
Reply
Amanda Blue

It has only been 46 years or so since the bill was passed and Social Security payments began. It was a huge battle in the country just as the affordable health care act is now. People were up in arms about Social Security even though it only gave the elderly a very modest sum of money initially. Just enough to give them a little dignity after they had worked their entire lives.

Before that if someone didn't have family to take them in they went to a county home for the aged. It was anything but a home, people were just warehoused in drafty buildings that looked like barracks with just a cot in a dormitory full of cots in a row. People died rather quickly in such places because of diseases like tuberculosis.

Then as the cost for health care increased another bill was passed by congress for Medicare. Would the GOP take that away or cut it in half? I would like to see them give up their own health insurance coverage 1st to help balance the budget.

Maybe I have my facts confused here, if so can somebody correct me?

    Reply#2 - Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:18 PM EST
    Amanda Blue

    Well out of curiosity I did look up the information finally. Social Security refers to the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program.[1] The original Social Security Act[2] (1935) was passed by congress and then disputed by many who said it would cause another depression. It was decided by the Supreme Court in 1937 and declared constitutional and just. Turns out it spurred many older workers to retire freeing up jobs for young people which is exactly what will happen with the Affordable Health Care Act of 2010. Once people who have stayed in jobs because of the fear of not having health insurance due to pre-existing medical conditions feel free to change jobs or retire and not lose health coverage the high rate of unemployment will change.

      Reply#3 - Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:54 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com