A mandatory flu-shot policy imposed by Anderson, S.C. based-hospital AnMed Health led at least one employee to file a class-action lawsuit against the facility, citing a violation of privacy, reports the Anderson Independent Mail. At least two other people may join food service worker Bertha Hunter on the suit, according to the newspaper.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (31)
News Vine CoH
- 1 vote
"This is me. I am standing up for me," Hunter told WYFF4.com. "I am not taking it because they want me to take it. I know the health reasons and all, but, it's plenty people out there who don't take the flu shot, won't take the flu shot and have the right not to."
- 1 vote
A food service worker at a hospital? Yeah gee no reason why it should be important that they keep up on vaccinations and all! (sarc) I'm just glad I don't have to eat there. If a person works in a facility built specifically for people who are ill why should they not be expected to take all precautions? So they can make a statement about their rights? I'm sure the kid undergoing chemo who she gives the flu to will be glad she stood up for "who she is". Might not ever happen but why not do everything you can to prevent it? Especially when you're serving up food to people who already have a health problem going on.
- 1 vote
What's next? Everybody in health care has to take prophylactic antibiotics to prevent the spread of staph?
- 1 vote
That would be rather irresponsible if they aren't sick. We've got enough drug-resistant bugs out there.
- 1 vote
That would be rather irresponsible if they aren't sick.
So is forcing or using coercion to get the flu shot.
- 1 vote
Requiring vaccinations of food service workers at a hospital is irresponsible? You lost me there.
- 1 vote
Only 40% of healthcare workers, including doctors and nurses, get the influenza vaccine. There's a reason for that. And health authorities don't like it. Mandatory vaccinations will increase those percentages and give the hospital workers more authority when reccomending a vaccine they previously did not partake in.
If a person works in a facility built specifically for people who are ill why should they not be expected to take all precautions?
Since you believe everyone is vulnerable to vaccine diseases then why not have the hospital require all visitors to be up to date with vaccines or get the vaccine they don't have at the door? Or is that just over the line for you? Would not the unvaccinated or behind on booster visitor put the hypothetical " but vaccines will save their life" cancer patient at certain risk of imminent death?
We know that most of the vaccines work.. otherwise we would have more of what we are trying to protect against.. When I was a lad.. we were getting polio shots.. and that if I am correct.. was eliminated for the most part in the United States..that is just one example..
I would prefer to take a vaccination.. then to have the outcome of not taking it... life is a crap shoot.. better to have the devil you know.. than to have the devil that will kill you.
- 2 votes
We know that most of the vaccines work.. otherwise we would have more of what we are trying to protect against.
The flu vaccine's effectiveness is questionable and debatable.
A Shot of Fear
Flu Death Risk Often Exaggerated; So Is Benefit of Vaccine
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102200042.html
"In the absence of good randomized trial data, it is still possible to gauge the effectiveness of vaccination by looking at time trends in flu vaccine rates compared with flu-related deaths in the elderly. As more people get vaccinated, you would expect the flu-related death rate to decline -- if the vaccine is effective. But, as the graph below, titled "A Windening Gap," shows, despite a dramatic increase in vaccination among the elderly, deaths from the flu and pneumonia have hardly budged. (The calculations have taken into account the aging of the population.)
For younger adults, flu-related death is so rare that it has not been reliably studied: Doing so would require a trial of millions of people."
life is a crap shoot.. better to have the devil you know.. than to have the devil that will kill you.
Living your life based on a catchy slogan is risky.
- 1 vote
Since you believe everyone is vulnerable to vaccine diseases then why not have the hospital require all visitors to be up to date with vaccines or get the vaccine they don't have at the door?
The food service workers are handling the food patients will be eating. Visitors will pass through areas of the hospital never coming near many of the patients. They don't stop in each room to "share the love". Visitors can only be controlled to a degree but I would expect a bit more from the employees. When I'm sick I don't visit people in the hospital. How many hospital employees don't go in when they're ill?
- 1 vote
So do you believe all restaurant employees should also be forced to comply with influenza vaccine mandates since they too will handle your food?
If they were catering to hundreds of people ill enough to warrant hospitalization, absolutely. Granted I will pass on food if I see the employee serving up the orders is sneezing everywhere but that's just because it grosses me out - not because I've got health problems going on.
When a person through a drive thru window at KFC is fixing orders wiping their sleeve across their nose.. touching your food with bare hands.. I would want a shot that would protect me against that..
- 1 vote
I would want a shot that would protect me against that..
I'd sign up for that shot! Speaking of gross restaurant employees - if they've obviously bathed in perfume you should probably consider that the perfume might be their substitute for soap.
- 1 vote
consider that the perfume might be their substitute for soap.
Don't ya just hate that when someone does it?
I got my flu shot today.. so I should have the flu in the next week or two..lol
- 1 vote
I was thinking of my nephew's girlfriend when I typed that. She tends to work in wing joints and steakhouses. And bathes maybe once/week. Sleeps in her uniform. I never eat whereever she works :oP
I'll be getting mine this coming week and yeah I'll be sick for the rest of the winter if last year was any indication. I'm hoping that effect was just a "first-timer" reaction.
- 1 vote
I worked in a high tech place.. and as the women came in .. and some men.. my colleagues and I would remark that they must bathe in the stuff.. you could actually follow the odor after they left about 10-15 minutes or so later.. to the cubical that they work at. .. and damn.. I hate riding on an elevator with someone like that.. my sinuses just flare up.. headache
Before last year I went 9 years without a cold of any type .. healthy as an ox .. so my doctor says to me.. would you like a flu shot.. so I mentioned it to her (lovely lady doc)..about the 9 years.. she said.. well I do recommend it.. so I got it last year.. and I did not feel any different.. so I got it again.. Not a big whoop anyway..
- 2 votes
No, I meant that the cockroaches get vaccinated.
I got my flu shot today.. so I should have the flu in the next week or two..lol
2 things the vaccine apologists will say. First is deny that you actually have the flu without testing you OR say you didn't get vaccinated in time.
Second, they'll say your state of condition may be just like the flu; fever, aches pains, days off work, malaise, cachexia, etc. But it not THE flu it's influenza-LIKE illness. LOL.
Its the standard paradigm propaganda of defend vaccinations above all else. It couldn't possibly be that the flu vaccine has a low and unproveable effectiveness.
- 1 vote
I'll be getting mine this coming week and yeah I'll be sick for the rest of the winter if last year was any indication. I'm hoping that effect was just a "first-timer" reaction.
Vaccine fail or... vaccine REACTION!
It almost seemed like it lowered my immune system and made me more susceptible to stuff. Of course it didn't help that my daughter's cousin kept giving her colds which she generously shared with mommy. Others have told me they had the same issue the first time they got it so I'm hoping this round will be better. I'd prefer to keep getting one since I've got a little one at home.
- 1 vote
Yes.. having kids around does pose a problem.. once I threw my kids out.. which reminds me rubbish is due tomorrow.. we have had less outbreaks.. Kids tend to spread it a lot and especially when they are in school.. they bring it home from other kids.. like a vicious circle..
Its the standard paradigm propaganda of defend vaccinations above all else. It couldn't possibly be that the flu vaccine has a low and unproveable effectiveness.
There might be a certain small percentage that some things just do not take with certain people.. I'm in my 60's.. and I believe mostly in my immune system for fighting what ever ails me... and so far now 10 years without a cold of any kind.. that my antibodies have built up enough to defend my system... Plenty of rest eating right ...and I tend not to shake hands of an acquaintance or try to hang around large gatherings.. and I do not use antibacterial soaps..
Nothing works 100% of the time for everyone.. considering the mass of people that take the shot.. there will always be an acception to the rule.
- 1 vote
Others have told me they had the same issue the first time they got it so I'm hoping this round will be better.
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice.....
How does having a lowered immune system exactly help out your little ones or yourself?
How does having a lowered immune system exactly help out your little ones or yourself?
I think it's worth a try to give it another chance. If I do better with it this year I'll keep getting it. Anything I can do to try to avoid passing something serious along to my daughter is okay by me. There is also another personal factor I have to consider which very well could have played a part in how my body handled it last year.
- 1 vote
There might be a certain small percentage that some things just do not take with certain people.
Nothing works 100% of the time for everyone.
With the flu vaccine its not even close to 100%. With your age group the efficacy is much closer to 30%. Who knows what the effectiveness actually is. (efficacy is the test tube antibody response in a clinical trial. Effectiveness is what actually happens in the real world. Did it actually prevent influenza or not.)
The "nothing's 100%" is a seeded propaganda line that should be looked into more closely.
The "nothing's 100%" is a seeded propaganda line that should be looked into more closely.
Although it isn't 100% .. it is better than nothing at 0%.. some people it takes longer to build antibodies in their immune system.. who knows.. It doesn't matter to me if 80% of the country doesn't take it.. its not my concern. It's the luck of the draw.. for some.. damned if they do, damned if they don't .. Is it better to have it, or is it better not to have it.. only the person getting the shot would have any idea what they want.. It's not a big Whoop...
- 2 votes
Is it better to have it, or is it better not to have it.. only the person getting the shot would have any idea what they want.. It's not a big Whoop...
I don't have any problem with that. But, this article is about forcing or coercing someone else to get the flu shot by threatening their livelihood and career.
No one can force you to take a flu shot..however.. if you work where you are in close proximity of customers and food service..etc.. I would want my employees to have the flu shot.. if not only for their health and safety, but for the customers that they come in contact with. IT is common sense.. and logical to expect that if a person works around other people.. not unlike being in an enclosed school.. where things like that can be passed on to one another.. Why should someone who does not have the flu shot and does get the flu or even a minor case of it, have the right to pass it on to others to allow it to spread? Where are their rights?
Many people do not do what they should do logically speaking.. and create harm to others because they feel they are allowed to do whatever... Being responsible for oneself is one thing.. but to think about what one does what harm we bring to another.. For instance: A person next door to you decides to burn wood outside and the odor and smoke is coming into your window, stinking your house up and the odor is penetrating everything in your home.. you come home to a smelly house... That guy has a right to burn.. but does he have a right to stink up your home?
- 2 votes
Why should someone who does not have the flu shot and does get the flu or even a minor case of it, have the right to pass it on to others to allow it to spread? Where are their rights?
People with the flu shot also get the flu. They undoubtedly "spread" the flu to others. So if someone who get's the flu shot but still gives someone else the flu do they have a right to sue the vaccine manufacturer and the healthcare facility for fraud? The illusion of flu protection. "triple flu protection"?
Do you see some of the problems with that type of reasoning? Also I would sue my employer for any side affects that come from mandated vaccinations. If everyone who experienced side effects from a employee enforced vaccine campaign, did so, then said industry would no longer exist as such. This is why vaccine manufacturers have liability immunity from the govn't. It is in the pharmaceutical companies and the government officials who makes such decision's best interest.
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



